There are real solutions to unsupportable MCA and other business debt. Unfortunately, too many business owners under stress are taken in by predatory business debt relief firms without understanding the difference. One of the most misleading options business owners encounter is so-called MCA consolidation. While it's often marketed as a form of refinancing, it's usually just another predatory loan in disguise

Beware: MCA 'Consolidation' Schemes

Some businesses, desperate for relief, turn to so-called MCA consolidation loans, believing they are refinancing their debt into a more manageable structure. In reality, these schemes are often just another high-cost MCA disguised as a solution. Instead of reducing the business's burden, these "consolidation" agreements frequently come with:

• More aggressive repayment terms, sometimes requiring daily or even multiple daily withdrawals.
• Higher total payback amounts, often stretching the business's distress further instead of solving it.
• Personal guarantees or confessions of judgment (COJs), which can lead to rapid legal enforcement and asset seizures.

Many debt relief companies claim they can "consolidate" MCA debt, but if the new loan carries the same predatory terms—or worse—it's not a real solution. Business owners should be extremely cautious of any firm promoting MCA consolidation without offering a clear path to true financial recovery.

What Works: A Restructuring Plan for MCA Debt

A business should instead turn to a nationally recognized small business restructuring firm—one that works with creditors, including MCA lenders, to alter repayment terms, relieve short-term cash flow pressure, and guide the business toward long-term financial stability. Secured lenders can also be a valuable resource, as many have experience navigating distressed situations and may offer refinancing options or restructuring guidance that avoids the pitfalls of debt relief firms.

For lenders, actively working with a borrower through an Article 9 restructuring or other structured workout can salvage a distressed credit while preserving or even expanding the lending relationship under more sustainable terms. By engaging early, at the first signs of an eroding credit, lenders can help steer borrowers away from predatory settlement firms and toward real solutions that preserve enterprise value and repayment capacity.

Successfully navigating financial distress requires a comprehensive approach—one that prioritizes long-term stability over short-term fixes. Experienced turnaround professionals and lenders recognize that only a holistic restructuring plan can help a business recover from an unsupportable debt position.

When dealing with MCAs, this often means renegotiating repayment terms as a critical first step to ease cash flow. From there, a restructuring firm might work with the business to produce and demonstrate several months of auditable financials and performance based on the newly adjusted terms. The goal? To qualify the business for lower-cost traditional funding and refinance out of high-cost MCAs.

In other cases, an Article 9 restructuring may be the best path—allowing the business to remove MCAs from its balance sheet while positioning it for conventional financing.

Ultimately, every situation is unique and requires a tailored approach. However, there are key factors that always distinguish a legitimate restructuring plan from predatory 'debt relief' practices.

A legitimate restructuring plan will always:

Engage with MCA lenders immediately, rather than stalling or advising a business to stop payments, which only invites legal action.

Negotiate altered repayment terms that keep a business operational while avoiding lawsuits, account freezes, and collection actions.

Provide short-term cashflow relief, allowing the business to stabilize and avoid further distress.

Position the business for responsible refinancing, helping it qualify and transition from high-cost MCAs to conventional, lower-cost financing with the SBA, asset-based lenders, or non-MCA revenue-based lenders.

Beyond the MCAs, underlying operational or management issues often brought about the demand for taking them on. So a holistic turnaround plan involves more than just getting out of MCAs but also addressing the issues that led an owner to them in the first place.

Another hallmark of a true debt restructuring firm is likely clear evidence that the firm has a history of working alongside major banks, corporate law firms, financial advisories and other reputable institutions and professional organizations. Simply put, business owners must do their due diligence if they want to make sure they find a trusted advisor, not a boiler room telemarketer.

The Bottom Line: What Works vs. What Makes Things Worse

Business owners facing financial distress must look past the sales pitches of debt relief firms and understand the risks. The traditional debt settlement model—stalling creditors and collecting high fees—often leaves businesses in worse shape than before.

By working with a reputable small business restructuring firm that collaborates with major financial institutions, turnaround experts, and legal professionals, a business can escape the cycle of high-cost MCA debt without facing legal battles, bankruptcy, or shutdown.

Before signing with any firm, business owners must take the time to do their research, read contracts carefully, and ask hard questions. The wrong decision can leave a business owner deeper in debt and with fewer options than before.

If a business owner becomes overwhelmed by MCA debt or other business loans, they should consult with a small business restructuring expert before committing to any debt relief program. Taking the right steps now can mean the difference between recovery and financial ruin.

Robert DiNozzi serves as Chief Growth Officer for Second Wind Consultants, overseeing brand strategy and value-added relationships with lenders, investors, business intermediaries and other stakeholders. Prior to Second Wind, DiNozzi spent 15 years in Hollywood as a feature film producer and executive, overseeing the creative development and structured finance of film projects at MGM, Paramount, Warner Brothers, Walt Disney, Universal and other studios and production entities including Ron Howard's Imagine Entertainment and Kopelson Entertainment.

References:

"New York state weighs law to curtail predatory lending abuses." Bloomberg. June 17, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-17/new-yorkstate-weighs-law-to-curtail-predatory-lending-abuses

Celmer, G. Personal interview. March 4, 2025.

"Consumers Beware: Debt Settlement Services." Consumer and Worker Protection NYC. NYC.gov. Retrieved from https://www.nyc.gov/assets/dca/downloads/pdf/consumers/Consumers-Beware-Debt-Settlement-Services-English.pdf

"FTC official: 'Legal loan sharks' may be exploiting coronavirus squeeze." NBC News. April 8, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/ftcofficial-legal-loan-sharks-may-be-exploiting-coronavirussqueeze-n1173346

"Debt Settlement: Fraudulent, Abusive, and Deceptive Practices Pose Risk to Consumers." GAO-10-593T. Government Accountability Office. April 22, 2010. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-10-593t

Konish, L. "How to avoid a debt settlement scam." CNBC. March 14, 2022. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/select/how-to-avoid-a-debt-settlement-scam/

Sullivan, K. "What are the risks of debt settlement?" Experian. Sept.15, 2023. Retrieved from https://www.experian.com/blogs/ask-experian/debt-settlement-risks/