{
  "artboards": [
    {
      "file": "Main.dc.html",
      "title": "A · The Ledger",
      "x": 0,
      "y": 0,
      "w": 1200,
      "h": 940,
      "page": "page-1"
    },
    {
      "file": "Vault.dc.html",
      "title": "B · The Vault",
      "x": 1320,
      "y": 0,
      "w": 1200,
      "h": 780,
      "page": "page-1"
    },
    {
      "file": "Concierge.dc.html",
      "title": "C · The Concierge",
      "x": 0,
      "y": 1300,
      "w": 1200,
      "h": 880,
      "page": "page-1"
    },
    {
      "file": "Cabinet.dc.html",
      "title": "D · The Cabinet",
      "x": 1320,
      "y": 1300,
      "w": 1200,
      "h": 880,
      "page": "page-1"
    },
    {
      "file": "CabinetPhone.dc.html",
      "title": "D · Phone — pinned rail",
      "x": 0,
      "y": 0,
      "w": 390,
      "h": 880,
      "page": "page-2"
    },
    {
      "file": "CabinetDrawer.dc.html",
      "title": "D · Phone — flyout",
      "x": 500,
      "y": 0,
      "w": 390,
      "h": 844,
      "page": "page-2"
    }
  ],
  "annotations": [
    {
      "id": "held-constant",
      "x": 0,
      "y": -452,
      "w": 940,
      "text": "All four use The Sands' own palette and the app's real type, so what differs between them is structure, density and interaction model — not branding. Any of them would carry the other two properties' colours unchanged.",
      "page": "page-1"
    },
    {
      "id": "take-a",
      "x": 0,
      "y": -300,
      "w": 620,
      "text": "A · THE LEDGER — an archive, set like a book.\n\nNo cards. Hairline rules, tabular dates, the year as a quiet numeral in the margin, a colour dot carrying the category. Luxury here is typographic restraint, and it scales: 159 documents look composed rather than endless.\n\nTradeoff: the densest of the four. An owner who visits twice a year meets a wall of text, and there is nowhere obvious to press.",
      "page": "page-1"
    },
    {
      "id": "take-b",
      "x": 1320,
      "y": -300,
      "w": 620,
      "text": "B · THE VAULT — four rooms, entered one at a time.\n\nDark ground, documents as lit plates. Categories are the front door, not a filter. Fewer things on screen, more presence — the most distinctly premium of the four.\n\nTradeoff: two clicks to anything, and the least information per screen. Dark interfaces also divide people sharply, and this audience skews older.",
      "page": "page-1"
    },
    {
      "id": "take-c",
      "x": 0,
      "y": 1030,
      "w": 620,
      "text": "C · THE CONCIERGE — ask, don't browse.\n\nOne question, and the four things owners actually come for. Built for the person who signs in twice a year wanting the AGM minutes — the shortcuts and the search both work, so you can try it.\n\nTradeoff: hides the shape of the archive. Someone who wants to see everything the corporation holds has to go looking for that view.",
      "page": "page-1"
    },
    {
      "id": "take-d",
      "x": 1320,
      "y": 1030,
      "w": 620,
      "text": "D · THE CABINET — structure that never leaves the screen.\n\nA standing rail of collections and years beside the documents; click through it and nothing reflows away. The most functional of the four, and the closest to what the site does today. The collections rail is live — the year rail is drawn but not wired.\n\nTradeoff: the most conventional. It reads competent rather than special, and the rail costs real width on a phone.",
      "page": "page-1"
    },
    {
      "id": "phone-rail",
      "x": 0,
      "y": -300,
      "w": 440,
      "page": "page-2",
      "text": "PINNED RAIL — the collections become a scrolling row under the header, always on screen.\n\nThis keeps the take's whole point: the structure never leaves. You can see where you are and move sideways in one tap, thumb-height. Try it — the chips work.\n\nCost: only collections fit. Year has to become a second control lower down."
    },
    {
      "id": "phone-drawer",
      "x": 500,
      "y": -300,
      "w": 440,
      "page": "page-2",
      "text": "FLYOUT — the rail as a drawer, shown open.\n\nIts real advantage: both rails fit, so year browsing survives on a phone. It is also the conventional answer, so nobody has to learn it.\n\nCost: the structure is hidden behind a tap, which is exactly what The Cabinet exists not to do. And you read the archive through a dimmed page."
    },
    {
      "id": "phone-verdict",
      "x": 0,
      "y": -430,
      "w": 940,
      "page": "page-2",
      "text": "You asked whether the side panel becomes a flyout. It can — but I would not. Both are drawn here at 390pt so you can decide from the thing itself."
    }
  ],
  "launch": {
    "view": "canvas",
    "page": "page-2"
  },
  "pages": [
    {
      "id": "page-1",
      "name": "Four takes"
    },
    {
      "id": "page-2",
      "name": "Cabinet on a phone"
    }
  ]
}